Peer Review Policy

The Fari Journal of Global Affairs and Security Studies follows a rigorous and transparent peer review process to maintain the quality and integrity of the research it publishes. This policy outlines the journal's commitment to providing a fair, thorough, and constructive review of all submitted manuscripts.

1. Double-Blind Peer Review

  • The journal uses a double-blind peer review process, meaning that both the identities of the authors and the reviewers are kept confidential during the review process. This ensures impartiality and objectivity in the evaluation of manuscripts.
  • Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the relevant field of the submitted article, ensuring a thorough and informed review.

2. Reviewer Selection

  • Reviewers are chosen based on their expertise, track record of scholarly work, and relevance to the manuscript topic. The journal seeks to engage reviewers from a wide range of geographic and institutional backgrounds to ensure diversity and comprehensive perspectives.
  • The editorial board may also invite subject-matter experts to review articles for specialized topics.

3. Review Criteria

  • Manuscripts are evaluated on the basis of several criteria, including but not limited to:
    • Originality: The manuscript presents new and innovative insights relevant to global affairs and security studies.
    • Relevance: The content is significant and valuable to the academic and policy communities.
    • Methodology: The research methodology is sound, transparent, and appropriate for the research question.
    • Clarity and Structure: The manuscript is well-written, logically structured, and clearly articulated.
    • Contributions to the Field: The article advances current knowledge and adds meaningful contributions to the field of global affairs and security studies.
    • Ethical Standards: The manuscript adheres to ethical guidelines regarding research, data collection, and publication.

4. Reviewer Responsibilities

  • Reviewers are expected to evaluate the manuscript critically and provide constructive feedback to the authors. Their comments should aim to improve the clarity, accuracy, and contribution of the article.
  • Reviewers are asked to maintain confidentiality and avoid conflicts of interest. They should not use information from the manuscript for personal or professional gain.
  • Reviewers will recommend one of the following decisions:
    • Accept: The manuscript is deemed ready for publication with minimal or no revisions.
    • Minor Revision: The manuscript can be accepted for publication after addressing some relatively minor revisions or clarifications.
    • Major Revision: Substantial changes are required, and the manuscript should be resubmitted for a second round of review.
    • Reject: The manuscript is not suitable for publication in its current form, typically due to issues of originality, methodology, or relevance.

5. Editorial Decision

  • Based on the feedback from the peer reviewers, the Fari Journal of Global Affairs and Security Studies’s editorial board will make the final decision regarding manuscript acceptance or rejection. Authors will receive detailed feedback from the reviewers, along with the editor's decision.
  • The editorial team strives to make decisions in a timely manner, typically within 4 to 6 weeks of receiving the manuscript. Authors will be informed promptly if additional time is required.

6. Revision and Resubmission

  • Authors are required to address all reviewer comments and make necessary revisions before resubmitting their manuscript. In cases of major revisions, a second round of peer review may be required to ensure that the manuscript meets the journal’s standards.
  • Authors must provide a detailed response to the reviewers’ comments, explaining how each point has been addressed in the revised manuscript.

7. Ethical Guidelines

  • The Fari Journal of Global Affairs and Security Studies adheres to high ethical standards for publication, including the prevention of plagiarism, duplication of publication, and fabrication or falsification of data.
  • The journal follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines for handling issues of misconduct and ensures transparency in all aspects of the review and publication process.

8. Appeal Process

  • In cases where authors disagree with the editorial decision, they may appeal the decision by submitting a formal request to the editorial board. The appeal must include a clear explanation of why the author believes the decision was unjust.
  • The editorial board will review the appeal and may involve additional reviewers or experts if necessary. The final decision on appeals will be communicated promptly.

9. Conflicts of Interest

  • The Fari Journal of Global Affairs and Security Studies requires both authors and reviewers to disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could affect the peer review process. This includes financial, professional, or personal relationships that may influence the impartiality of the review.

10. Reviewer Acknowledgment

  • The Fari Journal of Global Affairs and Security Studies acknowledges the valuable contributions of reviewers in maintaining the high quality of published research. Reviewers are formally recognized in the journal’s annual reviewer acknowledgment section.
  • Reviewers may also receive a certificate of review upon request for their participation in the peer review process.

By adhering to this peer review policy, the Fari Journal of Global Affairs and Security Studies ensures that all published research is of the highest quality, rigorously evaluated, and contributes meaningfully to the field of global affairs and security studies.

This Peer Review Policy emphasizes transparency, fairness, and rigorous standards, ensuring that the Fari Journal of Global Affairs and Security Studies maintains its reputation as a leading platform for quality research in its field.